Are black women too picky for their own good?

I was having a conversation with a woman who stated some very startling but real facts about why there is such a shortage of mates within their own race.

And this is My reply in short

*evil stare*

So according to THIS information:

__~If you read the whole link, You would see that sadly black males have not achieved as much higher education as black females. Most well educated black males pick white women. ( I don't agree with it, but those are the facts) I think being marginalized and the lack of opportunitys leads to a decreased ability to be successful. Add to this the rate at which black males go to jail or are not seen as viable mates. It is sad, and we all know something needs to be done about it.__

So what THIS says is;


*SMART Black Men marry white women...*

*Most Black Men are ignorant or dumb or under educated...*

*Because society respect black women more, they employ them more often than they would black men...*

*Black men with criminal records or look like they do are often looked over as viable mates for black women in general...*

*Something needs to be done about it...*


*blank evil stare*


__*WOW*__


And all of this info is recorded by the census bureau?

So when you really take a deeper look at these statistics from a cultural aspect?

It kinda shows a loss in the value of NOT the black man as much as the ability for black women to better support their own race and their chances of finding a certain caliber of black men that they are noted of having to raise into better black mates as well as men.

That's DEEP!

Because there is also a study that states that more black inmates are released from jail with degrees than graduate from traditional collages.

And that's like saying that black men are better able to concentrate on their studies of higher education in a environment without women around.

But it comes with a cost of not being viable to black women anyway.

So it sounds like the statistics are saying that black women are the victims of their own demise!

__*WOW*__


And there are MORE black females than black males of adult age who rather find a suitable mate within their moral and personal interest.

And THAT is just the facts!

That's not the personal opinions of the masses of black women who's reasons for not being able to find exceptable mates within their own race.

And only the REAL SMART black men know that reality to be true enough to not choose black women as mates for some reason other than the need to marry within their own race.


So it seems that black people hate each other so much that they are more than willing to cause their own race to become as extinct as they possibly can instinctually!

__*WOW*__


I wonder where they learned that?

I know they just didn't get it from their mother!

So in theory Any jaded single black man is within his own right to be up in his feelings at the state of the current population of black females and their lack of the ability to choose their own race as "soul" mates, partners, and love interest.


__*WOW*__


That changes this who thread!


*evil stare*





respect

Beethoven: Revealing His True IdentitBeethoven: Revealing His True Identity

If ya didn't know?

In the 15^th and 16^th century, written history underwent a massive campaign of misinformation and deception. With the European slave trade in full swing, Afrikans were transported to various parts of the world and were stripped of every aspect of their humanity, and in most of western civilization, were no longer considered human. This triggered a wholesale interpretation of history that methodically excluded Afrikans from any respectful mention, other than a legacy of slavery. This can result in being taught, or socialized, from one perspective. In this instance, historical information tends to flow strictly from a European perspective. No judgment of right or wrong is being made here, only that the breadth was very narrow in scope.

In an age where history is seriously being rewritten, new information is coming forth that is shocking intellectual sensitivities. What was once considered written in stone is now melting away with the discovery of facts that heretofore have been hidden or omitted; things so different that they are generally classified as controversial or unusual.

What specifically is being referenced, is the true identity of Ludwig van Beethoven, considered Europe’s greatest classical music composer. Directly, Beethoven was a black man. Specifically, his mother was a Moor, that group of Muslim Africans who conquered parts of Europe--making Spain their capital--for some 800 years.

In order to make such a substantial statement, presentation of verifiable evidence is compulsory. Let's start with what some of Beethoven's contemporaries and biographers say about his appearance. Frau Fisher, a close friend of Beethoven, described him with “blackish-brown complexion.” Frederick Hertz, German anthropologist, used these terms to describe him: “Negroid traits, dark skin, flat, thick nose.”

Emil Ludwig, in his book “Beethoven,” says: “His face reveals no trace of the German. He was so dark that people dubbed him Spagnol [dark-skinned].” Fanny Giannatasio del Rio, in her book “An Unrequited Love: An Episode in the Life of Beethoven,” wrote “His somewhat flat broad nose and rather wide mouth, his small piercing eyes and swarthy [dark] complexion, pockmarked into the bargain, gave him a strong resemblance to a mulatto.” C. Czerny stated, “His beard--he had not shaved for several days--made the lower part of his already brown face still darker.”

Following are one word descriptions of Beethoven from various writers: Grillparzer, “dark”; Bettina von Armin, “brown”; Schindler, “red and brown”; Rellstab, “brownish”; Gelinek, “short, dark.”

Newsweek, in its Sept. 23, 1991 issue stated, “Afrocentrism ranges over the whole panorama of human history, coloring in the faces: from Australopithecus to the inventors of mathematics to the great Negro composer Beethoven.”

Of course, in the world of scholarship there are those who take an opposite view. In the book The Changing Image of Beethoven by Alessandra Comini, an array of arguments are presented. Donald W. MacArdle, in a 1949 Musical Quarterly article came to the conclusion that there was “no Spanish, no Belgian, no Dutch, no African” in Beethoven's genealogy. Dominque-Rene de Lerma, the great musical bibliologist, came to the same conclusion.

Included in this amazing discussion is a reference made of Beethoven’s teacher, Andre de Hevesy, in his book, Beethoven The Man. “Everyone knows the incident at Kismarton, or Eisenstadt, the residence of Prince Esterhazy, on his birthday. In the middle of the first allegro of Haydn’s symphony, His Highness asked the name of the author. He was brought forward.

“‘What!’ exclaimed the Prince, ‘the music is by the blackamoor (a black Moor). Well, my fine blackamoor, henceforth thou art in my service.’

“‘What is thy name?’

“‘Joseph Haydn.’”

We have all been fed false information for reasons previously mentioned. It is no secret that scholars, writers, critics, advertisers and Hollywood have changed history for their own specific reasons. What is uniquely different in the intellectual landscape, people of color now have an army of sophisticated scholars to combat the continuation and dissemination of false information that has been accepted as standard, as well as the canon in academia.

It is hoped that the revealing of this information will motivate others to critically look at all data flowing in their brains for authenticity. Hollywood is notorious for changing facts. I am not saying to hate Hollywood, but we do have to hold it accountable for disseminating inaccurate depictions, especially when it changes the course of history, by which our children are influenced.

Graphic credits:

1.) Louis Letronne, Beethoven, 1814, pencil drawing.

2.) Blasius Hofel, Beethoven, 1814, monochrome facsimile of engraving after a pencil drawing by Louis Letronne.

3.) Engraving by Blasius Hofel, Beethoven, 1814, color facsimile of engraving after a pencil drawing by Louis Letronne. This engraving was regarded in Beethoven's circle as particularly lifelike. Beethoven himself thought highly of it, and gave several copies to his friends.

©2003Kwaku Person-Lynn

Now you know


respect

Obama wins a Nobel Prize! And it's only His first year...

For just being the First African American President.
For His stance on Nukes.
For His style and His class.

And for His ability to be respected by the world more than the past few presidents we have had thus far.

He won!

President Barack Obama wins Nobel Peace Prize

By KARL RITTER and MATT MOORE, Associated Press Writers Karl Ritter And Matt Moore, Associated Press Writers – Fri Oct 9, 5:25 am ET

OSLO – President Barack Obama won the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize on Friday for "his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples," the Norwegian Nobel Committee said, citing his outreach to the Muslim world and attempts to curb nuclear proliferation.

The stunning choice made Obama the third sitting U.S. president to win the Nobel Peace Prize and shocked Nobel observers because Obama took office less than two weeks before the Feb. 1 nomination deadline. Obama's name had been mentioned in speculation before the award but many Nobel watchers believed it was too early to award the president.

"Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world's attention and given its people hope for a better future," the committee said. "His diplomacy is founded in the concept that those who are to lead the world must do so on the basis of values and attitudes that are shared by the majority of the world's population."

The committee said it attached special importance to Obama's vision of, and work for, a world without nuclear weapons.

"Obama has as president created a new climate in international politics. Multilateral diplomacy has regained a central position, with emphasis on the role that the United Nations and other international institutions can play," the committee said.

Theodore Roosevelt won the award in 1906 and Woodrow Wilson won in 1919. Former President Jimmy Carter won the award in 2002, while former Vice President Al Gore shared the 2007 prize with the U.N. panel on climate change.

The Nobel committee received a record 205 nominations for this year's prize.

In his 1895 will, Alfred Nobel stipulated that the peace prize should go "to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between the nations and the abolition or reduction of standing armies and the formation and spreading of peace congresses."

Unlike the other Nobel Prizes, which are awarded by Swedish institutions, he said the peace prize should be given out by a five-member committee elected by the Norwegian Parliament. Sweden and Norway were united under the same crown at the time of Nobel's death.

The committee has taken a wide interpretation of Nobel's guidelines, expanding the prize beyond peace mediation to include efforts to combat poverty, disease and climate change.

___

Associated Press Writer Ian MacDougall contributed to this report.

respect

Why yall hating on a Pimp Like Me for being called "DADDY"?

But not like it's a Daddy Dom kinda thang.

As a matter of fact?

It's not even a swagger.

But I BET you, somebody can relate to the subtle difference in calling a Pimp Dom Daddy and somebody who has a problem with the WORD Pimp!

Here lies the conflict.

Because even a Convict can be rehabilitated but Rehab is for quitters.

And not that THAT is not a bad thing, but the one thing that makes a difference in the two is what side of retirement are you.

True?

There was once a Man Named Sweet Daddy Grace.

if you was a saint? You will remember Daddy Grace as a Wonderful Pastor of a Powerful inner city church.

if you wasn't a saint? You will remember the image of a Sweet Black Man they called Daddy Grace.

Two Different type Dominant Men behind one face.

And many of Mothers had husbands but only ONE Daddy even if they say that would have to be Jesus!

And I'm trying not to take the Lords name in vain. But some will complain about that Gentleman Sir that became a Master and faster than you can say Alpha Male they would praise the Lord thy Monarch and the light and the dark they call a good man Daddy.

And that's more than a title of a polarity in a BDSM community you people are trying to sell Me.

But I fail to be moved by force on My own damned source and of course My own journey in doing Me and My Family.

But these people would rather kill Me than consider that a fantasy of becoming more like Me or at least like Me for being who I be.

A damn Pimp Daddy.

To the few who knew how to do what they do by teaching you that you can't be no TRUE Dom and be a swinger and a Pimp and a Nigga and NOT in a "N" word kinda way.

I'm talking about today...

In any way, anyone who has the guts to say is THEIR OWN Way. And they do it all day, every day. Should be able to play they own role until they head is "swole".

And Pimp Daddies don't collect snuggle bunnies and protect the freaky honeys. But they keep mad funnies for them dummies that bees sleeping on His Pimpish Nature.

But that's enough for people to hate your character.

But Pimp types don't need a reputation. Just like the Dominant definition of a BITCH or a Diva or a Madam.

But Dick aint Dominance and more hoes with they had Him.

So the few who do?


Sometimes...

Enjoy calling a Pimpish Dominant Daddy more than they want admit that they love some Pimp Shit too.

Can get the best of you.

Like Voodoo.

The Dark Shit I love to do...

Is deeper that just trying to be fucking around with some BDSM lifestyle shit.

*evil stare*

A Pimp once told Me: *"Hey Boy, don't never trust a Gentleman Dom. Because they will bullshit you faster than they bullshit they own game. And a Pimp will do the same thing, only He will respect you enough to be up front about it."*

I thought about that long and hard as I listened to people call out for the father and the son and that holy spirit that seemed to make them wet from the Top or the bottom.

*snicker*

And I remembered the sound and the difference when someone calls a Pimpstyle Gent DADDY.

And Now I am a Grown Ass Man.

And the people who call Me Daddy?

Don't get everything they ask for when they do it.

Sometimes they hate being called out on trying to hustle you in humility.

And sometimes they just want attention or a spanking.

*evil grin*


And sometime they don't know any better because seldom have they ever found a Brother so down that He's damn near a Pimp!

And sometimes people treat a Daddy Dom like a wimp.

Just because his dick went limp!

And Dick aint dominance to a Dominant Pimp.

And that's why some little gurls get wet in the panties off of the fantasy of calling a Pimpish Dominant Provider...


Daddy


But it takes game to make game.

And aint nobody gonna complain if you got good game.

Fuck fame!


I am Alpha Master Pimp Sir EZ

The Lord GOD Loki

And if your lucky?

you can call Me Daddy.

*wicked grin*

And wish you had Me.


...

But I aint one to gossip so you aint heard it from Me!

...

[Now THIS is game!]


...



respect

The miseducation of our own mentality. Taking back our humaity.

I was chatting with a old friend of Mine.

We were talking about the current issues.
Mostly our people and our children.
And what needs to be done.

And he said:
I Just look at our babies and our homes, and thats the bottom line.
and with that said i also feel we as brother's have to fine more time being king's, treating, and reminding our women that they are Queens and not so called Diva's

And I replied;

Yeah...

But being Kings and Queens in theory is great.

I think the problem with that theory is the conduct of many Kings and Queens are not very impressive too. It gives off a Elitist midset that most can't handle humbly.

Ladies and Gents is better. Because you can teach the difference between what they are and what they should do.

The ROYAL mentality is KILLING our people.

*blank stare*

We have to get back to Humanity.

Being better humans to each other.

Being better partners to our mates.
Being better friends to each other.

And being better at not just knowing our selves, but knowing our deeper selves and striving for a deeper knowledge of our greater selves to be.

I think we are teaching with the wrong images and causing our people to compete and not relate.

That's what we have competitions and not relationships.

They don't KNOW any better.

If it takes a village? Then we have to find a better reason to respect the need of community and get back to being better people to other people.

We as a people have lost sight of what's right for what we have been learning right now.

And our children are mutants and not little animals. We have to learn how to help them learn how to better MASTER their mutations and not try to mimmic(sp) our inferior images of the past.

I was a prodigy child. Gifted.
But nothing as gifted as many of todays children are becoming.

We have to stop trying to make robots.

And make better humans who are trained to respect all of humanity

We as a people have been mis-educated.

We have been taught to be elitist and not humble humans.
We have been taught to be Diva's and not Ladies.
We have been taught to be Players and not Gentlemen.
We have been taught to be Royals without responsibility to whom you serve.
We have been taught it's Us against Them and not that we all are communal people in need of building better bridges and support and not barriers and enemies.

We have been taught a warped sense of reality.

And it's less important to mention who and why more than what we should be NOW and HOW.

Because we as a world of people are becoming a new world of new people who are in need of learning from each other and not trying to dominate over each other.

We need to take back our humanity.

And learn to become better humans with each other.

Because that's all we have left.

Each other.


respect

Arguing is a red flag or a reality check. know the difference.

Conflict in communication is a red flag.

I will call that conflict arguing for the sake of the OP.

The MOST Important issue here is WHY there is a conflict in respect that is supported by a certain faith in whom you serve.

Arguing is allowed in certain circumstances.

Self preservation.

Deal breaking.

A break down in trust of judgement.

Consideration of becoming ignorant.

And confusion.

*blank stare*

If you admit yourself to a hospital?

The ONLY reason to argue with your Health Care Provider is all of the same so this is not about BDSM.

And the law allows you to get a second opinion.

But it's a crap shoot if you get a different result.

So if the same is proven from the 2nd and even 3rd opinion? Then the first should be given a apology out of respect. But that's not important because that involves personal ethics.

Arguing in of it's self is a red flag between each who finds enough conflict to protest.

Now...

Conflict resolution is a hard pill to swallow because the FIRST person who has hat duty is the Dominant in that dynamic.


Because something has become lost to such a extreme that the submissive has loss the ability to trust in your opinion.

What's all of this mean?

Arguing is a red flag that is ONLY respected when there is a sign of concern for the reason why the submissive felt the need to dispute and even disagree with your logic or Dominance.

And each person owe it to the other or not to consider the INSTINCT a red flag as soon as it becomes realized.

It's a important human instinct that is more of a red flag than a insult.

Until we know the difference?

We have no control over the emotional need to defend our emotions with conflict.

*blank stare*

Maybe THAT was too deep for yall?




respect

Someone asked Me about sub mission in theory...

I have been noticing a great deal of different types of submissives actually.

So it's kinda hard to describe because I really don't have any in My system..lol

anywho...

sub mission...

It says to yield to the will of others.

I see some who are naturally submissive and get off on following or being lead. But not like their dumb or nothing, but like they really like to follow. Kinda like the OLD SONG before most of you guys time Little Peggy March - I Will Follow Him That image of a love for someone that is complete at the point of sub mitting to their mate.

And then there are the kind that want someone to lean on more or less. And the difference is that they don't want to be under them 24/7 like the first description but want to have a partner who is more of a head of a household they reside in. So they do the Manly things and they can submit to them in comfort.

I know them two are alike...

Then there are the service types that kinda like doing things for people.

One type is like they love to serve. They like seeing the result of their service on the face of others.

Another is more of a giver. They just want to give. Whatever it is they want the feeling of willfully giving away as much as they can bare. That actually is emotional.

And then there is the sympathizer. The bleeding heart type that wants to comfort or care for somebody. And this type can be divided into two types. I'll use the nursing field as a example for them.

1 is ok with working in a hospital and even doing blood work but nothing too messy or mushy.

The other is a hard core care giver type that wants to make your last days comfortable. Even changing bed pans or sitting with you until you take your last breath.

Both of these types are driven by a act of nurturing or acting out of sympathy for someone as a reward.

And then there are the sexual types.

1 just wonts to be used. And while this use may reach the point of door mat, they are fine with that image. Sometimes they have deeper issues of feeling the need to be treated as less than human.

Another is the kind who wants attention. And I mean they want to be the center of that attention. And they are willing to do whatever to be the center of their attraction and attention.

Another is someone who wants a fair trade. They look for someone who treat them with a fair exchange of TPE. Most times they tend to get more than normal but that is only because the Dominate type likes to give.

And then there are the types who just want something.

They really are not submissive more than they are lonely. And whatever they have to do to not be bored or alone is coo with them within reason.

That type tends to switch when bored. Or just feeling the need to switch things up.

Now ALL of these types are NOT set in stone.

Each example can include a little of another or a lot of one.

But sub mission as a act is really the most powerful act to be mastered when mastered.

The ability to complete someone or even support everything from the rear is powerful and important.

While that act is often abused or ignored at the wrong times. When you find a connection worth working with? Anything is possible within that kind of dynamic.

But, there is no ONE TRUE way about it because as individuals we all are unique.

A really good sub missive is one who not only is driven to find out what kind of sub missive they are, but also wants to improve their craft to be better supportive to whom ever they find worthy of their time and efforts.

Everyone has some submissive and Dominance within them.

The degree and the attraction to either polarity is up to the individual.

So all of this is just My opinion in My observation of these lifestyles and many people within them.

But a healthy PARTNERSHIP demands a equal balance of each polarity at all times within a relationship of some sort.

I will say this...

NOBODY will ever find out how well they are at being any of these polarities in minutes or days and even years.

Life is a journey.

We all have to learn to give t all we got for as long as we can take it.

And learn how to take more and give more.

Living is a Art.

Loving is a Craft.

Life is a Job.

It's hard work if your doing something right!

There is no off switch in being a Dominant or a sub missive.

So ya might as well find out how much you have to work with before, during and after you find yourself headed into these type dynamics.

BDSM is not a selfish sport unless it's a fetish.

sub mission is NOT a fetish.

respect